Actual Defense Motions & Criminal Complaint for Challenging Texas Transportation Code Cases.

Apologies for My Extended Absence in Posting New Content.

Hello all. I realize it has been awhile since I’ve posted on the blog, but I have been swamped with rewriting the legal due process and ‘traffic’ seminar material, organizing and preparing for the availability of on-line classes, and trying to design an upcoming greenhouse aquaponics project (which I will be starting another blog on when I get it going).

Now that my extended absence has been explained, let’s get to the grist of this new article.

 

“Yippee Ki-yay, Motherfucker.”

Yippee Ki-yay Motherfucker

For all you People that have been subjected to the highly fraudulent processes and procedures associated with being issued, and then having to deal with, a “transportation” related citation alleging the commission of a Texas Transportation Code regulated offense by some willfully ignorant and indoctrinated ‘bot minion of THE STATE OF TEXAS, I announce that it is time for you to rejoice. Below you will find three embedded documents that explain why. I hope that you never have to use them, but, if you do, that you have the best chance possible in stomping the shit out of the opposition.

 

How to Read and Use Seminar Documents…

Just like all of the documents in the seminar material, you will find colored highlighting of certain sections of text. Each color has a specific meaning and requires a specific action by you when using the document. I’m sorry, but I don’t know how else to do this in a Word document so as to work just as well for those people who happen to be color blind, so please do your best.

The text that is highlighted in yellow signifies a piece of factual information that is specifically relevant to your case and its associated persons and events. These facts will take the form of dates, times, names, places, reference numbers, personal pronouns, etc., etc. For those facts that are repeated throughout the document, you can simply do a search and replace the text of the default fact to change it into the text specific to your case. This is especially easier than a manual replacement of each personal pronoun reference in the document. Personal pronouns will be terms such as I, you, he, she, it, we, they, me, him, her, us, and them.

Text that is highlighted in light blue (Cyan) signifies text that, if factually true, correct, and relevant to your specific matter, can simply have the Cyan highlighting removed and other wise left unchanged (except where there is also yellow highlighted text signifying a specific fact that needs to be changed). However, if the highlighted test is not true, correct, and relevant to your specific matter, it should be selected and completely deleted from the document.

In order to make certain that the use of search and replace didn’t confuse a personal pronoun reference for yourself with that of the officer, judge, or other party or person involved in facts of the matter as stated within the document, each personal pronoun use has its own qualifier prefix.

For instance, any personal pronoun that applies to you, as the Respondent, in the document, is highlighted in yellow and has the prefix “res,” as in “reshis/her,” “reshim/her,” “ress/he,” etc., etc. By doing a search and replace for either of these strings of characters (minus the double quotes), you can choose to replace each occurrence with the appropriate personal pronoun, such as “he” or “she”, “him” or “her”, “his” or “hers”, etc., etc.

By the same token, any personal pronoun that applies to a specific officer in the document is highlighted in yellow and has the prefix “off[Badge#],” as in “off[7856]his/her,” “off[7856]him/her,” “off[7856]s/he,” etc., etc. By doing a search and replace for either of these strings of characters (minus the double quotes), you can choose to replace each occurrence with the appropriate personal pronoun, such as “he” or “she”, “him” or “her”, “his” or “hers”, etc., etc.

Lastly, and just for an FYI kind of point, any personal pronoun that applies to a specific judge in the document is highlighted in yellow and has the prefix “jud[#],” where the pound sign (#) represents some number associated with that particular judge, i.e. the 1st judge I saw in the case was …, and the 2nd judge I appeared before or issued some order was …,” for which I’m sure you can figure out the rest of it from the above examples.

 

What the Embedded Documents Actually Are.

“Freedom! Yeah Baby!” ~ Austin Powers

 Yeah Baby Yeah

The first document is an editable copy of a criminal complaint that YOU will be filing against the judge, in his/her magisterial capacity, who presides over the court in which your case is to be heard, if a certain condition precedent has been set, which it almost certainly will be.

This criminal complaint addresses the various highly illegal ‘form letters’ that are being used and issued as a fictitious and fraudulent legal order and summons by virtually every magistrate of every justice and municipal court in the entire Texas republic, regardless of what actual form that letter may actually take. Suffice it to say that, whatever form this letter does take, it still will not be in the form actually required by law to constitute a legally valid order and summons. The kicker is, that, the magistrate, as the head of the court and the one legally responsible for all that goes on there, by issuing these illegal form letters, is actually guilty of several high crimes and misdemeanors under both Texas and federal law. Crimes that unavoidably result in knowing and willful violations of your due process rights.

You will be filing this criminal complaint against the magistrate of the court based upon specific Texas law regarding the mandatory requirements for a specific ‘legal process’, which is the technical name for legal documents like judicial orders, warrants, summons, etc. The term usually refers to the kinds of legal documents that are required to be served at some specific point in time relevant to the progression of a prosecution, on a particular party associated with the matter before the court, and commanding some specific action from them, such as to appear in court on some stated specific date and time for instance. In this particular case, the legal process with which we are taking issue is that of imitating a legally valid summons, which the aforementioned form letter is fraudulently pretending to be.

The second document is an editable copy of a Motion to Quash the Unlawful Summons, i.e. the illegal form letter, which is to be filed jointly with the first document (criminal complaint).

When you read through this document, you will see what you need to be looking for in a valid legal summons, as well as what specific statutes govern the requirements for that specific type of legal process. Similar information will also be stated in the criminal complaint.

The third document is an editable copy of a Motion to Quash the Unlawful Citation & Complaint, which is also based upon specific legal requirements for such instruments under Texas law and the right of due process that are glaringly non-existent on the face of the citation and the criminal complaint created by THE STATE OF TEXAS.

 

Respondent’s Legal Armor, Sword, & Shield – The Documents.

The Criminal Complaint:

200(0) EC – SCS – Sworn Criminal Statement SLP, AoOC, OO

The Motion to Quash Unlawful Summons:

ETC-200(Z)-RMQS Motion to Quash Unlawful Summons

 

The Motion to Quash Unlawful Citation & Complaint:

ETC-200-(D)-RMQC Quash Citation & Complaint for Failure to State an Offense v2018-07-24-000.00

 

Use them in good health and with extreme prejudice.

2 thoughts on “Actual Defense Motions & Criminal Complaint for Challenging Texas Transportation Code Cases.

  1. I cannot tell you how happy I am to find this on the 63rd. I am currently in the process of have been falsely accused, arrested and a false protective order placed on me by Judge Robert Cadena of the 83rd Judicial District. Judge Cadena was appointed by my ex father in law Judge Carl Pendergrass to be on the bench for the remainder of Judge Pendergrass’s term due to Judge Pendergrass being terminally ill.
    My ex husband stole a racehorse from me and sold it because he refuses to work and needed money. When I was about to report the horse stolen, my daughter attacks me in front of my ex who wouldn’t get her off of me. Four days later he filed a police report stating that I had beat my daughter instead of telling the truth and that I was the victim. CPS got involved, and the detective with the police department refused to hear my side and put a warrant out for my arrest for something I didn’t do. We were supposed to have a visiting Judge for the Civil Hearing and Judge Cadena heard it instead. I was very confused. Needless to say it did not go well for me and I lost my children. Motion of Recusal was submitted for the criminal hearing and Judge Cadena was still the judge on the bench. I need some help with this. I reported him to the State Commission, but I am looking at 10 yrs in prison and was charged with a 3rd degree felony/injury to a child. No one has heard my side and was denied my say in court by Judge Cadena and if I insisted on being heard I was told the punishment would be worse for me. Please help me with this!!!

    Like

  2. I was pulled over by a public official in Seminole, Gaines county, Texas for out of date tags.
    The officer ran the license plate and then ran the VIN number on the driver’s door. ( The vehicle had been wrecked and repaired. The door was from a wrecking yard.)
    I informed the officer that that was the wrong vin. I was ignored. 3 times I informed him of this. I was asked if they could search my vehicle. I replied NO I do not condone illegal searches. So I was placed under arrest for displaying fictitious plates and auto theft.
    The officers then proceeded to search my vehicle. Then finally one of them ran the correct vin .
    Of which was all clear. They had no case or cause for arrest or search. So to cover themselves I was arrested for displaying expired tags and no insurance.
    The officer said we are not going to argue the Constitution here. So I tell the judge that set my bail about the right to travel and the Constitution. He says ‘Not in Texas”. To which I replied. ” You’re telling me that Texas does not recognize the Constitution of the United States??
    He replied “yeah that’s right”.
    Do then today I go to arraignment
    And the judge ask me how I plea. I said I don’t plea. I am innocent of the accusations brought before me. He says ok im writing down not guilty. I said you can’t do that that is practicing law from the bench and he said yes I can.
    U said weeell if you really think so.Then he said sign here and I said I can’t do that. He was gonna throw me back in jail. He called for an officer and all. Finally he gave me a court date.
    Any and all thoughts in this whole thing

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s