… BOTH of these judges should be judicially disrobed, disbarred, and publicly castrated (no, I really didn’t mean to say castigated)…
… it allows… the officer AND the prosecutor to… decide… what legally constitutes “evading/evasion” in order to charge and prosecute…
It is axiomatic that, as a general rule, most reasonable and intelligent people already believe that the vast majority of attorneys are scumbags, liars and thieves, and rightly so.
The TV show “Breaking Bad” does have some useful information in it, and not just for drug kingpins.
Always be thinking ten moves ahead of them at all times, not just when you think about it.
As an ex-deputy sheriff I can say with absolute certainty that this officer is totally clueless about the limits of his enforcement authority under the Texas Transportation Code, which is NONE, because I know the officers are NOT trained on those actual laws EVER and are simply told by word of mouth from their superiors…
“Yippee Ki-yay, Motherfucker.”
Therefore, when a prosecutor objects on the grounds that “the officer isn’t required to know that,” they are actually admitting that their witness is legally and factually incompetent to testify to those facts because they lack personal knowledge, and would be both committing perjury and violating the admissibility and hearsay rules by answering.
Why do you think it is that the entirety of the United States and state Constitutions, as well as the concepts and importance of every individual’s inherent and fundamental rights and liberty as ensconced within the history of our earliest American law, are not being taught to our children throughout their entire educational process?”