It is you that is arguing that “driving,” … is synonymous with the individual right to privately access and use the public right-of-way for the purpose of traveling for one’s own private business or pleasure.
Business use = privilege. PRIVATE use = RIGHT of use. You cannot really understand or argue anything at all about the subject of “transportation” until you are willing to examine into and truly understand those distinctions.
Remember, our American laws are not written in common everyday English, but, rather, they are written in a language known to a particular few as legalese.
“All might be free if they valued freedom, and defended it as they should.” ― Samuel Adams
“It’s Only a Few Bad Apples…” – News flash Mr./Ms. Slow Learner and Wilfully Ignorant, it only takes one bad apple to eventually spoil the whole barrel, which is what that adage originally means. It does NOT mean that having ONLY one or more mixed into a full barrel of good apples is nothing major…
Do you think $200 is an “unreasonable” price value on a human life in the post-police-state America of today?
How Patrinuts react when you use factual research to disprove the facts supporting their unsound legal theories.
Why the Patrinut Methodologies Fail in Court With Painful Regularity.
A “Constitutional Attorney” tries to tell me why HE thinks I’m fundamentally wrong about “transportation” and other regulatory law not applying to We the People in our private capacities and activities.
Attorneys – Less useful and more intolerable than pig shit on a hot day?