The very concept of “public policy” being controlling over our individual rights and privileges is, in and of itself, wholly unconstitutional, as it removes all of our individual rights and privileges and subjects them to the wayward approval or disapproval of whatever constitutes the “public policy” of the moment.
“Yippee Ki-yay, Motherfucker.”
How Can a Statute be “Enlarged” by Adding Something not Written and Still Avoid Being Unconstitutionally Vague, Ambiguous, and Over-broad?
Therefore, when a prosecutor objects on the grounds that “the officer isn’t required to know that,” they are actually admitting that their witness is legally and factually incompetent to testify to those facts because they lack personal knowledge, and would be both committing perjury and violating the admissibility and hearsay rules by answering.
Why do you think it is that the entirety of the United States and state Constitutions, as well as the concepts and importance of every individual’s inherent and fundamental rights and liberty as ensconced within the history of our earliest American law, are not being taught to our children throughout their entire educational process?”
If you wanted to survive the Colosseum as a gladiator, you had to learn how to be the best and most awesomely skilled gladiator you could be.
What happens when an alleged “investigative journalist” only ‘investigates’ the alleged facts and history of their news and articles from the very sources that taught them to think only from the inside of society’s socialized and collectivist brainwashing box?
Do you have the guts to really see and understand how the shyster attorneys use their bogus ‘legal’ system to screw every last one of us for their own private gain and control over our society?
It is you that is arguing that “driving,” … is synonymous with the individual right to privately access and use the public right-of-way for the purpose of traveling for one’s own private business or pleasure.